Forge Platform

Fleet as an Approved Execution Rail

Generated draft. Review source-of-truth ownership, claims, and links before promotion.

Updated

Generated draft. Review source-of-truth ownership, claims, and links before promotion.

Reader Problem

Readers need a human-oriented explanation of 'Fleet as an Approved Execution Rail' before they can act on the technical detail.

Outcome

They understand the business meaning, the Forge mechanism, and the next safe step.

Forge Mechanism

Fleet runs automation jobs inside controlled infrastructure boundaries.

Trust Boundary

The hydration agent generates review drafts only; humans choose whether and where to promote them.

Draft Narrative

This note should explain the platform boundary: Forge Platform owns contracts, schemas, routing language, and ecosystem architecture. Execution remains in product runners, forge-workcells, or Fleet jobs. That distinction keeps the platform as a control-plane spine instead of a monolithic agent runtime.

Suggested CTAs

  • Open the platform reference architecture.
  • Review the workcell catalog before adding execution code.
  • Confirm product boundaries before promoting implementation claims.

Promotion Notes

  • Keep runtime implementation claims aligned with the platform/workcells split.
  • If this becomes canonical architecture, add it to the relevant handbook index.

Source Excerpt

Fleet as an Approved Execution Rail ## Core thesis Fleet stands out as Forge's controlled execution rail: a small HTTP control plane for docker_argv jobs, templates, logs, telemetry, and operator-runbook automation on one Linux host....